While formatting an HDD, you get to choose the file system along with other related settings. You can choose from FAT, exFAT, or NTFS. As per recent reports, Microsoft is testing support for a new file system to Windows 11 –ReFSorResilient File System. This new addition has pushed many users on the edge and sparked theReFS vs. NTFSdebate. If you are wondering which file system is best for you, read this post for a detailed comparison.
What is NTFS?
NTFS, orNew Technology File System, is a popular file system used in many storage devices. Microsoft introduced this file system in 1993 with Windows NT. It was developed as a journaling file system to supersede FAT32 and address its limitations.
With features like file system compression, disk quotas to conserve disk space effectively, and enhanced performance & security, NTFS took over the world by storm. To this date, all the latest storage devices are formatted to this file system by default.
However, despite the numerous benefits, its shortcomings, such as the inability to handle data corruption, limited compatibility with non-Windows devices, etc. gradually came into light.
Let’s look at some more advantages and disadvantages of NTFS below.
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
| Uses log files & checkpoints to restore data after a reboot or a system failure. | Limited compatibility and support for non-Windows computers and external devices. |
| Its dynamic cluster management allows it to allocate and map a new cluster for the data alongside remapping the bad sector. | Limited scalability compared to ReFS. Supports a maximum file or volume size of 256TB. |
ACLs or Access Control Lists, along with user-level encryption, helps users encrypt their data. |
No automatic data/file corruption repair mechanism. This leads tounexpected data loss. |
Allows users to add folder or file-level permissions for certain user groups or users. |
These disadvantages necessitated an improved file system. Thus came the ReFS or Resilient File System.
Now that you’re aware of NTFS’ advantages and limitations, let’s understand what is ReFS and how it compares with NTFS in terms of scalability, interoperability, and storage.
What is ReFS?
Mainly intended for enterprise use,ReFS或有弹性的文件系统m is the newest file system introduced by Microsoft in 2012 with Windows Server 2012. Originally developed as a replacement for NTFS, it was designed to address its limitations by improving upon the existing features like data availability.
提供了新的功能,如添加参考文献支持larger data clusters, improved scalability, and resilience against data corruption.
Unlike NTFS, which was built from scratch, ReFS was developed using some code borrowed from NTFS. It usesB+ treestructure containing a root, internal nodes, and leaves.ReFSuses the allocation-on-write or copy-on-write method to execute read-write operations in one go, thereby bringing down the memory usage, disk usage, power consumption, etc..
ReFS takes full advantage ofStorage Spaces. When combined with it, the file system uses various background features like automatic repair, automatic metadata integrity checks, and more toavoid data loss. Unlike NTFS, where the user has to type in the CHKDSK command to find and repair any corruption, ReFS has automated this process and performs this check on its own.
There’s another area where ReFS offers improved performance and functionality. When used with virtual machines, ReFS uses block cloning, which reduces storage space consumption by creating linked copies of a master file. These linked copies occupy less space than the original file and can be created quickly.
另一个很好的特性,虚拟机达克es advantage of in ReFS is Sparse VDL. Sparse VDL or Sparse Valid Data Length drastically reduces the creation time of Hyper-V virtual machines by using the zero-filing files technique.
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
ReFS is resilient to data corruption |
Windows cannot use ReFS to boot |
Improved scalability for large data sets |
ReFS is a resource-intensive file system. It impacts IO processes when installed on individual PCs. |
Automatic metadata integrity check |
It cannot convert NTFS data to ReFS. |
Mirror-accelerated parity to improve performance & efficient data storage. |
ReFS misses out on features like file system compression & encryption, hard links, etc. |
NTFS vs. ReFS
Now that we have a clear understanding of ReFS and NTFS, let’s see an overall comparison.
NTFS |
ReFS |
Non-resilient to data corruption |
Resilient to corruption |
Supports up to 256TB file/volume size |
Supports up to 35PB file/volume size |
Uses log files & checkpoints for manual restoration of the disk |
It uses automated checks while reading and writing data |
Improved performance with techniques like file compression, disk quota, resizing, etc. |
It uses techniques, such as mirror accelerated parity for improved performance & efficient storage. It uses sparse VDL & block cloning for enhanced performance of virtual machines. |
Compatible with almost every Windows version. |
It is compatible with only newer versions of Windows, like Windows server 2012 & Windows 8.1 or later. |
File level snapshots not available. |
File level snapshots available. |
Thin provisioningis only available in the Storage Spaces. |
Thin provisioning is available as a general feature. |
Block cloning not available. |
Block Cloning for increased performance and data availability without compromising storage space. |
Sparse VDL not available. |
Utilizes sparse VDL for faster creation of VMs |
Which is Superior?
With a clear distinction of the advantages, disadvantages, and features of both NTFS and ReFS discussed above, it becomes easy for us to pick the right file formatting system.
If you are looking for a file system replacement for your personal computer, ReFS still has a long way ahead to become the perfect file system for individual PCs.
一长串的失踪特性,还是参考文献l not ready to be used on personal computers. However, if you are looking for a file system for a high-performance server or aHyper-Vvirtual machine for file-level storage, then ReFS is the perfect choice. It can handle large amounts of data while safeguarding against data loss.
